In re Audre, Inc., 216 B.R. 19 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1997)
It is generally held that the separate corporate existence of a subsidiary will be recognized absent illegitimate purposes unless (a) the business transactions, property, employees, bank and other accounts and records of the corporation are intermingled, (b) the formalities of separate corporate procedures for each corporation are not observed, (c) the corporation is inadequately financed as a separate unit from the point of view of meeting its normal obligations; (d) the respective enterprises are not held out to the public as separate enterprises; and (e) the policies of the corporation are not directed to its own interest primarily, but rather to those of the other corporation. H. Henn and J. Alexander, Laws of Corporations § 148 at 355-56 (3rd ed. 1983).
In re Folks, 211 B.R. 378, (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1997)
Purported creditor did not have standing to assert alter ego claim
International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 332, AFL-CIO v. Hyland Wilson Elec. Contractors, Inc., 881 F.2d 820, (9th Cir. Cir. Cir. 1989)
Factors for disregarding corporation entity in 9301(a) cases.
Firstmark Capital Corporation. v Hempel Financial Corporation., 859 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1988)
Wife cannot be liable for husband's and corporation's wrongdoing.
